![]() That's certainly not a blocker since macOS 12 Monterey brings support for the Rosetta 2 compatibility layer, which we found last year to run x86 apps in a fast and transparent manner on the 2020 Mac mini. Second, many of the tests we can run on macOS are built for x86 processors. We did this with the 2020 Mac mini, and it only makes sense to do the same thing here. However, with one of the primary reasons to buy a Mac being the software, we'll be looking at a few Mac-specific tests a little later, as well. We're going to make do with the best we have, which is largely cross-platform applications. That includes the heavier 3DMark tests and many Windows-only games. First off, a good number of our performance benchmarks are Windows-only utilities, so they won't appear here. The only question left is how much will the 8-core and 12-core models cost? Given the price of the 8-core and the 12-core processors ($1723 and $2614, respectively) I expect both models will be quite expensive, even when compared to the $3999 6-core model.Before we go any further, we should note a couple of things. Even if you don't consider the new industrial design, the fact that Apple has moved from the outdated Nehalem and Westmere processors to the new Ivy Bridge processors should be exciting for all Pro users. I'm really excited about the upcoming Mac Pros as they're the first significant update in over three years. The upcoming 6-core model will only be 10% slower than the current base 12-core model, and the 8-core model is faster than most of the current 12-core models. The 6-core and 8-core models are also quite speedy. The upcoming 4-core model will be between 58% and 78% faster than the current 4-core models, and the upcoming 12-core model will be between 17% and 47% faster than the current 12-core models. Multi-core performance is also significantly better. For example, the upcoming 4-core model will be between 50% and 75% faster, and the upcoming 12-core model between 16% and 32% faster, than the equivalent current models. The upcoming Mac Pro will have significantly better single-core performance than the current Mac Pro. How do the upcoming Mac Pros compare to the current Mac Pros? I think the 12-core model will appeal to users with heavily-threaded applications that can take advantage of all 12 cores, while everyone else will be much happier with the superior single-core performance the other models offer. ![]() However, the 12-core model will have the best multi-core performance. These estimates also suggest that single-core performance will be 15% lower for the 12-core model. ![]() However, it is welcome news since users will not have to sacrifice single-core performance when choosing between the 4-core and the 6- or 8-core models. Since all of the processors have the same Turbo Boost frequency, and since the processors run single-core tasks at the Turbo Boost frequency, this isn't surprising news. These estimates suggest that single-core performance will be similar for the 4-, 6-, and 8-core models. Here are my estimated Geekbench 3 scores for the upcoming Mac Pros: Luckily, since Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark, we can estimate the missing Mac Pro scores using results from Windows workstations that use the same processors as the Mac Pros. Using this information, and information from the Intel ARK processor database, here are the processors I expect to see in the upcoming Mac Pro: ProcessorĮven though some Geekbench 3 results have leaked for the upcoming Mac Pro, results are not available for all of the upcoming models. While Apple hasn't announced which processors will be used in the upcoming Mac Pro, they have provided some details on the Mac Pro specification page. Arguably the most important component when it comes to performance is the processor. Ever since the first updated Mac Pro result appeared on the Geekbench Browser back in June, everyone has been curious about how the upcoming Mac Pros will perform. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |